The debate surrounding former President John Dramani Mahama’s potential bid for a third term has intensified, following a bold and impassioned endorsement by seasoned media personality Omanhene Kwabena Asante. Speaking on Asempa FM’s flagship political program *Ekosiisen*, Omanhene didn’t mince words: “I strongly support Mahama if he wants to go for a third term—and there’s nothing wrong with it.” His statement, delivered with conviction, has stirred both admiration and controversy, reigniting a national conversation about leadership, constitutional boundaries, and the future of Ghanaian democracy.
Omanhene’s endorsement is not merely a personal opinion—it’s a reflection of a growing sentiment among segments of the Ghanaian populace who view Mahama as a stabilizing force in turbulent times. Citing Mahama’s track record in infrastructure development, education reform, and economic management, Omanhene argued that Ghana needs a leader with proven experience and resilience. “We’ve seen what he can do. If the people want him back, why should the Constitution stand in the way?” he asked, challenging the rigidity of term limits in the face of popular will.
This endorsement comes amid swirling speculation that Mahama may be considering a constitutional amendment to pave the way for a third term. While the 1992 Constitution currently limits presidents to two terms, legal scholars are divided on whether a reinterpretation or amendment—through parliamentary approval and a national referendum—could make a third term legally viable. Some argue that the Constitution must evolve with the times, especially if the electorate demands continuity in leadership.
Supporters of Mahama’s potential return point to the current economic challenges, rising youth unemployment, and perceived governance lapses as reasons to bring back a leader with experience navigating crises. They believe Mahama’s leadership could restore investor confidence, strengthen institutions, and rekindle hope among disillusioned citizens. Omanhene’s voice adds weight to this narrative, given his influence in shaping public opinion and his reputation for candid political analysis.
However, the endorsement has not gone unchallenged. Critics, particularly from the New Patriotic Party (NPP), have condemned any talk of constitutional amendments as a threat to democratic norms.
They warn that allowing a third term could set a dangerous precedent, eroding the checks and balances that protect Ghana’s democracy. Some have accused Omanhene of partisanship, while others question the timing and intent behind his remarks.
Social media has become a battleground for this debate, with hashtags like #MahamaThirdTerm and #OmanheneSpeaks trending across platforms. While some users praise Omanhene’s courage and clarity, others express concern about the implications for constitutional integrity and political stability.
As of now, Mahama has remained silent on the matter, neither confirming nor denying his intentions. His silence has only fueled speculation, with political analysts suggesting that Omanhene’s endorsement may be a strategic move to test public reaction and lay the groundwork for a formal announcement.
Whether this moment marks the beginning of a broader movement or remains a solitary endorsement, it has undeniably shifted the political discourse. The question is no longer just about Mahama’s ambitions—it’s about the soul of Ghana’s democracy, the elasticity of its Constitution, and the power of public opinion in shaping the nation’s future.
Source: ASEMPA FM OMANHENE ASANTE
