I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment regarding the recent proceedings of the Appointments Committee. As a dedicated party member and avid observer of the parliamentary vetting process, I was dismayed by the unproductive approach employed by the Minority Leader.
The Minority Leader’s prolonged and unnecessary questioning not only squandered valuable time but also hindered the committee’s efficiency. Furthermore, the unbecoming scenes that unfolded were a disservice to the dignity of Parliament and a blatant display of disrespect towards the nominees and their esteemed guests.
The vetting process in this country has been a subject of controversy, with many questioning its relevance and effectiveness. Over the years, the process has been criticized for being a mere formality, with some nominees being approved despite displaying limited knowledge of their designated portfolios.
A case in point under Akufo Addo’s administration is the approval of Hawa Koomson as Minister for Fisheries and Aquaculture, despite her inability to define fish farming. This raises questions about the value of the vetting process and whether it truly serves its intended purpose.
The current state of the vetting process has been described as a “total joke” by some, with the Minority group in Parliament often being accused of engaging in unnecessary theatrics and grandstanding. The Chair of the Appointments Committee, Bernard Ahiafor, has even acknowledged that the process can be disorderly at times, citing the inexperience of some MPs as a contributing factor.
Given these concerns, it’s worth considering whether the vetting process should be reformed or even abolished. Some argue that the President should be allowed to select their own team without interference from Parliament, while others believe that the process serves an important function in holding nominees accountable.
Ultimately, the decision to reform or abolish the vetting process lies with the Constitutional review committee. However, one thing is clear: the current state of the process is in need of serious reform if it is to serve the best interests of the Ghanaian people.
