In a recent interview, Sammy Gyamfi, CEO of GoldBod, addressed his public exchange with Alexander Afenyo-Markin, stating that his earlier extortion allegation against the Majority Leader was not personal. According to Gyamfi, he was only responding to comments Afenyo-Markin had made about him, and he chose to accept Afenyo-Markin’s own claim that his remarks were also not personal, taking that explanation in good faith.
The statement has triggered massive pushback from members of the public, many of whom feel the explanation falls short of addressing the seriousness of the earlier allegation. A significant number of commenters have pointed out that Gyamfi had previously said he would not discuss the matter in the media again, only to revisit it. Others have questioned why a claim as weighty as extortion would be described as impersonal, arguing that such an allegation should either be substantiated or formally withdrawn rather than downplayed.
Several reactions call for the matter to be settled in court, insisting that public statements alone cannot resolve claims of this nature. Some commenters have gone further, suggesting that the sudden softening of tone hints at a behind-the-scenes resolution between the two parties, with a few describing it as a “back door deal.” Others have expressed disappointment that state anti-graft institutions have remained silent despite the seriousness of the original accusation.
The broader implication of this development is a growing public demand for accountability and consistency from public office holders, especially when serious allegations are made and later minimised. It also raises questions about how such disputes are handled outside formal legal or investigative channels. As reactions continue to trail the story, public interest remains high on whether the matter will be pursued further in court or quietly set aside.
Source
Author Avatar
BioNews
8594 followers
If you liked this story, please follow or tip the author to help them write more!
Tip
